<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Openness and Event Amplification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/openness-and-event-amplification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/openness-and-event-amplification/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: servis laptopova</title>
		<link>http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/openness-and-event-amplification/#comment-5699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[servis laptopova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/?p=4345#comment-5699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;servis laptopova...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Openness and Event Amplification &#171; Ramblings of a Remote Worker[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>servis laptopova&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Openness and Event Amplification &laquo; Ramblings of a Remote Worker[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Priestley</title>
		<link>http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/openness-and-event-amplification/#comment-3590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann Priestley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/?p=4345#comment-3590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of interesting issues here. The &quot;usual suspects&quot; factor is a good one, although some events can be a bit tribal digitally as well. 

Regarding business models and open content, this can be tricky for organisers to &#039;police&#039;. A conference I have followed a couple of times offers slides to delegates only, in a password protected area. However, presenters are increasingly posting their slides to Slideshare or a personal blog, and tweeting the link. Tut tut!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of interesting issues here. The &#8220;usual suspects&#8221; factor is a good one, although some events can be a bit tribal digitally as well. </p>
<p>Regarding business models and open content, this can be tricky for organisers to &#8216;police&#8217;. A conference I have followed a couple of times offers slides to delegates only, in a password protected area. However, presenters are increasingly posting their slides to Slideshare or a personal blog, and tweeting the link. Tut tut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsty Pitkin</title>
		<link>http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/openness-and-event-amplification/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsty Pitkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/?p=4345#comment-3581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, Marieke - and thanks for the mention!

One of the trends I&#039;ve observed more recently is that event organisers (in the academic sector) are moving towards tools that are free to access, but that require users to login in order to view the content.  This gives the organiser a bit more information about who is accessing their content, usually including their name, email address and sometimes their location.

Whilst this is being done with all the best of intentions, and is extremely helpful in improving the metrics we have available to reflect on the success of an amplified event, I wonder where this trend fits in with the open access theme? Are users paying for access with their identity?  What happens to the people who want to access the content but do not want to hand over their email address?  Is the content really open to them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Marieke &#8211; and thanks for the mention!</p>
<p>One of the trends I&#8217;ve observed more recently is that event organisers (in the academic sector) are moving towards tools that are free to access, but that require users to login in order to view the content.  This gives the organiser a bit more information about who is accessing their content, usually including their name, email address and sometimes their location.</p>
<p>Whilst this is being done with all the best of intentions, and is extremely helpful in improving the metrics we have available to reflect on the success of an amplified event, I wonder where this trend fits in with the open access theme? Are users paying for access with their identity?  What happens to the people who want to access the content but do not want to hand over their email address?  Is the content really open to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Activities for Open Access Week 2011 &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/openness-and-event-amplification/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My Activities for Open Access Week 2011 &#171; UK Web Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remoteworker.wordpress.com/?p=4345#comment-3579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In addition to describing possible environmental benefits which can be gained by enabling a remote audience  to participate in events, we will also describe additional benefits which can be gained by adopting a more open approach to events as described by my c0lleague Marieke Guy in a post on Openness and Event Amplification. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addition to describing possible environmental benefits which can be gained by enabling a remote audience  to participate in events, we will also describe additional benefits which can be gained by adopting a more open approach to events as described by my c0lleague Marieke Guy in a post on Openness and Event Amplification. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
